My Choice, My Vow….



I am a writer at Magazine, as well as the author of the OnOneOnlinesBlog.  We do present news in some format with our content.   That being said, in light of a few recent traumatic events that have altered the future paths of many people, I vow to only write the facts that are germane to allowing awareness to be made in regards to mental health and support outlets, etc.

I realized that as the author, I have the unique advantage of being able to choose what I will contribute to the world on my platform.  I choose to promote awareness and action for a healthier, happier, better future.

Consider these words that follow the next time you want to Tweet or Share:

Journalism ethics and standards

Common elements

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
The primary themes common to most codes of journalistic standards and ethics are the following.

Accuracy and standards for factual reporting
Reporters are expected to be as accurate as possible given the time allotted to story preparation and the space available, and to seek reliable sources.
Events with a single eyewitness are reported with attribution. Events with two or more independent eyewitnesses may be reported as fact. Controversial facts are reported with attribution.
Independent fact-checking by another employee of the publisher is desirable.
Corrections are published when errors are discovered.
Defendants at trial are treated only as having “allegedly” committed crimes, until conviction, when their crimes are generally reported as fact (unless, that is, there is serious controversy about wrongful conviction).
Opinion surveys and statistical information deserve special treatment to communicate in precise terms any conclusions, to contextualize the results, and to specify accuracy, including estimated error and methodological criticism or flaws.
Slander and libel considerations
Reporting the truth is almost never libel,[15] which makes accuracy very important.
Private persons have privacy rights that must be balanced against the public interest in reporting information about them. Public figures have fewer privacy rights in U.S. law, where reporters are immune from a civil case if they have reported without malice. In Canada, there is no such immunity; reports on public figures must be backed by facts.
Publishers vigorously defend libel lawsuits filed against their reporters, usually covered by libel insurance.

Harm limitation principle
During the normal course of an assignment a reporter might go about—gathering facts and details, conducting interviews, doing research, background checks, taking photos, and recording video and sound—harm limitation deals with the questions of whether everything learned should be reported and, if so, how. This principle of limitation means that some weight needs to be given to the negative consequences of full disclosure, creating a practical and ethical dilemma. The Society of Professional Journalists’ code of ethics offers the following advice, which is representative of the practical ideas of most professional journalists. Quoting directly:[4]

Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.
Recognise that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. The Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
Recognise that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.
Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.
Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed.

-found @ Wikipedia

Now imagine how it would feel if you were in one of these situations and on top of all you are dealing with you have bullshit online to attend to.  Not right at all.

Be aware and talk about it , don’t cross the line into disrespectful TMZ behavior.

Make the choice, Be The Change, I Am The Change!!!!

#MyChoice  #IAmTheChange  #320ChangesDirection   #five-signs    #changementalhealth   #MentalHealthMatters   #NIMHgov   #mhtodaymag   #MentalHealthAwarenessMonth   #MakChesterProud   #KeepThePromiseForChrisCornell   #nomorestigma


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.